Saturday, May 25, 2013

Dr. Mohd. Faisal Sham Abdol Hazis UNIMAS perlekeh Barisan Nasional.

Add caption

KUALA LUMPUR 23 Mei - Seorang pensyarah kanan Universiti Malaysia Sarawak (Unimas) menggunakan forum di Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (UKM), Bangi dekat sini hari ini sebagai platform untuk memperlekehkan kemenangan Barisan Nasional (BN) di Sabah dan Sarawak pada Pilihan Raya Umum Ke-13 (PRU-13).

Perbuatan itu dilakukan oleh Ketua Jabatan Politik dan Hubungan Antarabangsa, Fakulti Sains Sosial Unimas, Dr. Mohd. Faisal Sham Abdol Hazis semasa membentangkan analisisnya tentang kemenangan BN di dua negeri itu pada Forum Pasca PRU-13: Meneliti Hasil, Meneroka Ke Hadapan.

Beliau mendakwa, 'dominasi' BN di Sabah dan Sarawak mempunyai kaitan dengan struktur politik yang tidak demokratik, media tidak bebas, amalan politik autoritarian (strongman politics) dan birokrasi bersifat partisan.

Mohd. Faisal Sham turut mempertikaikan kewibawaan Suruhanjaya Pilihan Raya (SPR) dengan mengaitkan kemenangan BN dengan dakwaan pengundi hantu.
"Satu aspek lagi yang banyak diperkatakan tetapi lazimnya terlepas pandang ialah sistem pilihan raya yang tidak adil dan bebas.

"Kalau kita lihat di Sabah dari segi 'projek IC' telah banyak didokumentasi dan daripada pendengaran Suruhanjaya Siasatan Diraja (RCI) telah banyak membuktikan memang ada wujud pengundi 'projek IC' itu," katanya.

Beliau juga menuduh BN menggunakan samseng dan anggota Rela untuk mengugut serta menakut-nakutkan pengundi.

Dakwanya, samseng telah mengugut untuk membunuh seorang tuai rumah di Saratok, Sarawak sebaik sahaja calon BN kalah di salah satu saluran mengundi kawasan Parlimen berkenaan.

"Laporan polis telah dibuat. Kami tahu tentang kejadian itu kerana yang diancam ialah bapa saudara kepada salah seorang penyelidik kami," jelasnya.

Kata Mohd. Faisal Sham, pengundi juga diberitahu mereka tidak akan menerima bantuan kerajaan sekiranya mengundi pembangkang.

"Bagi mereka yang sudah terpanggil untuk membuat perubahan, elemen menakut-nakutkan pengundi akan berlaku.

"Ini menjadi antara sekatan yang menyebabkan mereka tidak mengundi pembangkang," ujarnya.


Forum bertukar sesi tohmahan terhadap BN

m.utusan.com.my/.../Forum-bertukar-sesi-tohmahan-t...

Translate this page
16 hours ago – Utusan Online - The Malaysian top news provider in Bahasa Melayu. ...Faisal Sham Abdol Hazis semasa membentangkan analisisnya tentang ...


Friday, May 17, 2013

BILA KEWARASAN SUDAH PUPUS....


When Reason Doesn't Work

I like the new Home Minister, the new IGP and his new Deputy.  I hope they can do something about that bunch of poor losers throwing tantrums all over the place non-stop because they can't get everything their way.

It seems that Datuk Seri Zahid Hamidi is making his presence felt immediately after his appointment as Home Minister and I agree with eddy, we need someone like him to tell it like it is.  That's one kick-ass Home Minister.

They have issues with our political system that has been in practice for yonks, our constitution that is the foundation of our nationhood, our national language that is supposed to unite us as a nation, and our flag, the symbol of our national pride.

They want to UBAH everything.

I would tell these idiotic protestors, rather than change everything to suit their selfish interests, why not just go migrate elsewhere, but I am sure no country would take them in, or give them PR status, let alone citizenship, because they have nothing of value to contribute, so we are stuck with them idiots.

And they knew this, that's why they are still here finding all kinds of excuses to stay on, all the while acting up like the mentally stunted juveniles that they are.

What surprises me, however, is the moronic behaviour of the urban masses who actually waste their time to listen to a bunch of immature, irrational and unreasonable geriatrics who just won't retire with grace as befitting their age.

These self-styled "educated urbanites" may be educated, but they don't seem to be particularly intelligent nor mentally discerning.

It amazes me that they seem to actually believe all that hype, that they are the clever, educated, enlightened ones, and all those who don't agree with their herd's high-class creeds of what is right and wrong are low-class, uneducated, rural bumpkins which they superciliously termed as Dumno.

You people, the so-called educated urbanites, you realise of course that as far as these politico agitators are concerned, all of you only equate to VOTES during elections and MOB POWER during street demonstrations and rallies.  

You are just making up the numbers, you know - 10,000, 50,000, 1,000,000 - the mob, the herd, rampaging in a stadium, through the streets, no different from the cattle runs still being carried out in some parts of the world.

And if you die in the stampede, your death will be politicised til kingdom come, but they don't really care that you died, just glad they have yet something else to blame on Umno/BN.

These unpatriotic mental midgets do not deserve our respect nor are worthy of our time as they are real self-absorbed jerks, who think that the world revolves around them and them only.

To them everything is about their kind of politics and they keep dragging everything and everyone into their spinning web of lies and half-truths, where their opinions overrule everyone else's.

It is okay if they don't have meaningful lives, but the rest of us do, and we want to move on without them clogging up the streets, noisy as hell, terrorising the internet with their belligerence that have severely limited my interest in reading up on local current issues.

Selfish jerks, the whole lot of them.  I wish the news agencies would just ignore them and just not pay any attention to any of their egotistical and self-aggrandizing statements, or in more simple terms ... "terlebih perasan".

To our guys enforcing our laws and keeping order, there is no point in trying to reason with these morons if they simply won't see reason.

Just round them sheep up and ship them off to an island somewhere off-Sabah, as near to Southern Philippines as possible, equipped with the minimum of tools, so they can create the kind of government they wish.  

Having to deal with real pirates and terrorists may make them appreciate Malaysia, since reason won't.

Anwar Ibrahim can become the President of a whole island, let's just name it The Republic of Bananas, and they can have political sermons every other day, "KO Umno" prayer sessions during political rallies every evening, and orgies on those days they aren't having religious sermons for all I care.

My new term resolution post-GE13, is to keep my cool in the face of stupidities of the political kind.


Monday, May 13, 2013

17 MURID BERDIRI ATAS KERUSI

Seorang guru Sekolah Rendah Kebangsaan Seksyen 19, Shah Alam bertindak menyuruh 17 murid berdiri diatas kerusi kerana ibu bapa menyokong BN dilihat satu pekara yang tidak wajar apatah lagi murid yang dimaksudkan berusia lingkungan 11 tahun.

Sehubungan dengan kejadian itu bapa seorang pelajar tersebut membuat laporan Polis di balai polis Seksyen 15 pada 10 Mei dan juga telah melaporkan perkara yang berlaku kepada Pejabat Pelajaran Dearah ( PPD) yang tidak jauh jaraknya dari sekolah tersebut.

Sebagaimana umum tahu,Penjawat awam adalah kakitangan kerajaan yang melaksanakan dasar-dasar kerajaan dan dibayar gaji oleh kerajaan yang memerintah negara ini tanpa mengambil kira kecenderungan politik samada kepada BN,PAS,PKR,DAP.Jadi mengapa pula guru tersebut mengamalkan sikap tidak profesional ketika menjalankan tugas beliau sehinga sanggup melakukan pekara yang tidak wajar kepada pelajar yang belum mengerti persoalan politik kepartian apatah lagi guru-guru dilarang berpolitik di sekolah atau semasa bertugas.

Apakah ibu bapa tidak rasa sangsi jika para guru mangamalkan politik ekstrem? Apakah tidak akan terjadi jika murid-murid yang ibu bapa penyokong BN atau PAS.PKR,DAP diberi markah rendah dalam peperiksaan kerana guru yang mengajar mereka tidak berpihak kepada parti yang disokong oleh ibu bapa murid.Memang ramai yang akan mengatakan pendapat MSA ini tidak masuk akal,tapi tidak mustahil jika ianya berlaku pada masa-masa akan datang .biarpun tiada bukti pekara seumpama itu berlaku pada era ini,tapi tidak salah rasanya jika MSA berpendapat sedemikian.

Berbalik kepada Isu..Difahamkan oleh beberapa rakan,kecenderungan politik guru tersebut kepada Pakatan Rakyat dan beliau juga difahamkan tinggal di kuarters guru.

Diharap pihak Kementerian Pelajaran membuat siasatan teperinci dan dapat mengambil tindakkan sewajarnya terhadap guru tersebut bukan berdasarkan sokongan politik kepada mana-mana pihak,sebaliknya berdasarkan kepada fakta siasatan.

Lihat apa kata bapa salah seorang dari pelajar...
Salam tuan,

Hari ini ada satu Penolong Kanan sekolah anak saya cakap pasal politik dlm kelas anak. Sapa yg sokong BN berdiri atas kerusi. Anak saya dan 17 org lagi murid2 pun berdiri atas kerusi dan disoal kenapa pilih BN. Anak saya jawab sebab Dato Nawawi dan cikgu tersebut mencebik dan suruh duduk.

Cikgu tersebut juga menulis di papan hitam berkenaan manifesto BN dan PR. Beliau mengatakan PR bijak dan BN bodoh. Esok saya nak jumpa Pejabat Pegawai Daerah(Pembetulan:Pejabat Pelajaran Dearah PPD) dan adukan perkara ini. Cikgu tersebut kurang ajar. Ini berlaku di Sekolah Rendah Kebangsaan Seksyen 19, Shah Alam, tengahari tadi. Nama guru Shamsuddin bin Majid, guru Ko-Kurikulum (koko) .

Hina sangatkah sokong BN, mohon dipanjangkan kepada pihak yg berkenaan. Guru seperti itu tak perlu ada di sekolah kerana bukan mahu mendidik tapi menghasut. Kerana beliau habis rosak nama sekolah dan perlu dibenteras. Saya rasa terhina.

Jamil Mohamad Isa





PANAS !!! GURU CELAKA !!! ANGKARA POLITIK MURID JADI MANGSA !!!! Seorang guru Sekolah Rendah Kebangsaan Seksyen 19, Shah Alam bertindak menyuruh 17 murid berdiri diatas kerusi kerana ibu bapa menyokong BN dilihat satu ...


13 mei 1969, disambut meriah, kenapa?

Ada perarakan kemenangan pilihanraya  menjelang 13  mei 1969, sekarang masih ada perarakan kemenangan pilihanraya (PRU13) menjelang 13 mei 2013. Kali ini perarakan ditunjangi se ekor KUDA yang pandai berpura-pura.

Jangan tanya nama dia sebab saya seperti Nik Aziz juga, terus meludah siapa jua yang bertanya.


8 mei 2013


menjelang 13 mei


menjelang 13 mei



Sunday, May 12, 2013

Masalah Blackout PRU14.

BLACKOUT- SELESAIKAN CARA MELAYU.





Dijangka Ramadan tahun 2017 jatuh pada 27 mei 2017  hingga 25 jun 2017. Raya Puasa jatuh pada 26 Jun 2017.
PRU 14 boleh diadakan pada mana-mana tarikh berikut:-

  1. 3 jun 2017
  2. 10 jun 2017
  3. 17 jun 2017
  4. 24 jun 2017


WAKTU ITU, ADA BERJUTA PELITA RAYA SELURUH NEGARA. DISITU ADA JAWAPAN UNTUK BLACKOUT YANG SANGAT DITAKUTI UMAT CINA DI MALAYSIA.



BLACKOUT: JAWAPAN


BLACKOUT: JAWAPAN


BLACKOUT: JAWAPAN

BLACKOUT: JAWAPAN

BLACKOUT: JAWAPAN




NIK AZIZ LUDAH MUKA MELAYU ISLAM..!!

Ludah ke Muka.. ptuihhhh!!

"Adakah nak tunggu sehingga ranap umat ini baharu nak bicara soal perpaduan? Saya tak boleh terima sampai ada yang kata nak meludah muka yang nak bawa usaha penyatuan Melayu ini. Ajaran agama mana yang kata begitu?" soal Nasha




Nik Aziz ludah muka




Kita sangat berharap Nik Aziz tidak meludah setiap orang Melayu yang bersuara demi perpaduan umat Melayu. Kalau Nik Aziz ingin terus perpisah biarkan dia keseorangan, menyepi di hujung usia.

SINGAPURA tangkap 21 rakyat Malaysia..!!!!!


21 rakyat Malaysia ditangkap di Singapura.


SINGAPORE: Police arrested 21 Malaysians after they were caught staging a protest at the Merlion Park at 4.50pm on Saturday, reported the Straits Times.

This despite earlier police advisories that such gatherings are against Singapore's laws.
"The police would like to reiterate (that) while foreigners are allowed to work or live here, they have to abide by our laws.
"They should not import their domestic issues from their countries into Singapore and conduct activities which can disturb public order, as there can be groups with opposing views.
Those who break the law will be seriously dealt with," said the local newspaper quoting a police spokesman as saying in a statement.. -- BERNAMA


Read more: 21 Malaysians arrested for staging outdoor protest at Merlion Park - Latest - New Straits Times http://www.nst.com.my/latest/21-malaysians-arrested-for-staging-outdoor-protest-at-merlion-park-1.277297#ixzz2T2t4TZ2y

DAP akan disiasat minggu depan.!

Pemilihan DAP: RoS dijangka panggil saksi minggu depan


Anthony Loke
anthony loke

RUZY ADILA IDRIS


SHAH ALAM –  Pendaftar Pertubuhan (RoS) akan mengadakan siasatan awam minggu minggu depan susulan kontroversi pemilihan Jawatankuasa Eksekutif Pusat (CEC) DAP Disember lalu.


Setiausaha Pengelola DAP, Anthony Loke berkata, pihaknya difahamkan RoS akan memanggil beberapa pihak yang berkaitan dengan CEC untuk memberikan keterangan.

“RoS akan memanggil beberapa beberapa pihak yang terlibat dalam proses pengiraan pengundian seperti juruaudit dan sebagainya,” jawab beliau ringkas kepada Sinar Harian Online.


Sebelum ini, DAP dihimpit dilema selepas menerima surat daripada RoS dua hari sebelum penamaan calon yang memaklumkan bahawa agensi itu tdak mengiktiraf CEC yang dipilih.


Sebaik surat tersebut diterima, rakan dalam Pakatan Rakyat (PR) mengambil keputusan membenarkan DAP menggunakan logo Pas di Semenanjung Malaysia, manakala logo PKR bagi Sabah dan Sarawak.






sumber:

Pemilihan DAP: RoS dijangka panggil saksi minggu depan ...

www.sinarharian.com.my/.../pemilihan-dap-ros-dijang...

Translate this page
4 days ago – Pemilihan DAP: RoS dijangka panggil saksi minggu depan ... susulan kontroversi pemilihan Jawatankuasa Eksekutif Pusat (CECDAP Disember lalu. ... Kestembak: Polis cari lelaki bantu siasatan · Dakwat kekal: Jabatan Peguam Negara ...





maklumat tambahan


Berita Harian | ROS sambung semula siasat penyelewengan

www.bharian.com.my/bharian/articles/.../Article

Translate this page
4 days ago – Pemilihan ahli CEC DAP mencetuskan kontroversi kerana didakwa wujud... tiraf pemegang jawatan DAP yang dibentuk dalam pemilihan CEC parti itu, 15 Disember ... Rumah calon BN kena baling bom · Lapan didakwa kes PRU-13 hari ini ...


Isu CEC DAP: Drama satu jam Guan Eng jumpa Pendaftar ...

ww1.utusan.com.my/.../Isu-CEC-DAP-Drama-satu-ja...

Translate this page
22 hours ago – KUALA LUMPUR 10 Mei - Setiausaha Agung DAP, Lim Guan Eng diminta supaya berhenti berdolak-dalik dengan arahan Pendaftar Pertubuhan (ROS) supaya ...

AMERIKA SYARIKAT TEWAS ditangan RAKYAT YANG TAAT KEPADA RAJA DAN NEGARA.

 Tony Cartalucci,   GLOBAL RESERACH

Wall Street and London’s hegemonic ambitions in Asia, centered around installing proxy regimes across Southeast Asia and using the supranational ASEAN bloc to encircle and contain China, suffered a serious blow this week when Western-proxy and Malaysian opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim’s party lost in general elections.While Anwar Ibrahim’s opposition party, Pakatan Rakyat (PR) or “People’s Alliance,” attempted to run on an anti-corruption platform, its campaign instead resembled verbatim attempts by the West to subvert governments politically around the world, including most recently in Venezuela, and in Russia in 2012.Just as in Russia where so-called “independent” election monitor GOLOS turned out to be fully funded by the US State Department through the National Endowment for Democracy (NED), Malaysia’s so-called election monitor, the Merdeka Center for Opinion Research, is likewise funded directly by the US through NED. Despite this, Western media outlets, in pursuit of promoting the Western-backed People’s Alliance, has repeatedly referred to Merdeka as “independent.”


Image: Despite the US mobilizing the summation of its media power and pouring millions of dollars into the opposition party, including the creation and perpetuation of fake-NGOs such as Bersih and the Merdeka Center, Malaysian Prime Minister Najib Razak sailed to a comfortable victory in this year’s general elections. The cheap veneer has begun peeling away from America’s “democracy promotion” racket, leaving its proxies exposed and frantic, and America’s hegemonic ambitions across Asia in serious question. 

The BBC in its article, “Malaysia election sees record turnout,” lays out the well-rehearsed cries of “stolen elections” used by the West to undermine the legitimacy of polls it fears its proxy candidates may lose – with  the US-funded Merdeka Center cited in attempts to bolster these claims. Their foreign funding and compromised objectivity is never mentioned (emphasis added) :
Allegations of election fraud surfaced before the election. Some of those who voted in advance told BBC News that indelible ink – supposed to last for days – easily washed off.
“The indelible ink can be washed off easily, with just water, in a few seconds,” one voter, Lo, told BBC News from Skudai.
Another voter wrote: “Marked with “indelible ink” and voted at 10:00. Have already cleaned off the ink by 12:00. If I was also registered under a different name and ID number at a neighbouring constituency, I would be able to vote again before 17:00!”
The opposition has also accused the government of funding flights for supporters to key states, which the government denies.
Independent pollster Merdeka Center has received unconfirmed reports of foreign nationals being given IDs and allowed to vote.
However, an election monitoring organization funded by a foreign government which openly seeks to remove the current ruling party from Malaysia in favor of long-time Wall Street servant Anwar Ibrahim is most certainly not “independent.”
The ties between Anwar Ibrahim’s “People’s Alliance” and the US State Department don’t end with the Merdeka Center, but continue into the opposition’s street movement, “Bersih.” Claiming to fight for “clean and fair” elections, Bersih in reality is a vehicle designed to mobilize street protests on behalf of Anwar’s opposition party. Bersih’s alleged leader, Ambiga Sreenevasan, has admitted herself that her organization has received cash directly from the United States via the National Endowment for Democracy’s National Democratic Institute (NDI), and convicted criminal George Soros’ Open Society.
The Malaysian Insider reported on June 27, 2011 that Bersih leader Ambiga Sreenevassan:
“…admitted to Bersih receiving some money from two US organisations — the National Democratic Institute (NDI) and Open Society Institute (OSI) — for other projects, which she stressed were unrelated to the July 9 march.”
A visit to the NDI website revealed indeed that funding and training had been provided by the US organization – before NDI took down the information and replaced it with a more benign version purged entirely of any mention of Bersih. For funding Ambiga claims is innocuous, the NDI’s rushed obfuscation of any ties to her organization suggests something far more sinister at play.
Photo: NDI’s website before taking down any mention to Malaysia’s Bersih movement. (click image to enlarge)
….
The substantial, yet carefully obfuscated support the West has lent Anwar should be of no surprise to those familiar with Anwar’s history. That Anwar Ibrahim himself was Chairman of the Development Committee of the World Bank and International Monetary Fund (IMF) in 1998, held lecturing positions at the School of Advanced International Studies at Johns Hopkins University, was a consultant to the World Bank, and a panelist at the Neo-Con lined National Endowment for Democracy’s “Democracy Award” and a panelist at a NED donation ceremony – the very same US organization funding and supporting Bersih and so-called “independent” election monitor Merdeka – paints a picture of an opposition running for office in Malaysia, not for the Malaysian people, but clearly for the corporate financier interests of Wall Street and London.
Photo: Taken from the US National Endowment for Democracy’s 2007 Democracy Award eventheld in Washington D.C., Anwar Ibrahim can be seen to the far left and participated as a “panelist.” It is no surprise that NED is now subsidizing his bid to worm his way back into power in Malaysia. (click image to enlarge)
….
In reality, Bersih’s leadership along with Anwar and their host of foreign sponsors are attempting to galvanize the very real grievances of the Malaysian people and exploit them to propel themselves into power. While many may be tempted to suggest that “clean and fair elections” truly are Bersih and Anwar’s goal, and that US funding via NED’s NDI  are entirely innocuous, a thorough examination of these organizations, how they operate, and their admitted agenda reveals the proverbial cliff Anwar and Bersih are leading their followers and the nation of Malaysia over.
As Bersih predictably mobilizes in the streets on behalf of Anwar’s opposition party in the wake of their collective failure during Malaysia’s 2013 general elections, it is important for Malaysians to understand the true nature of the Western organizations funding their attempts to politically undermine the ruling party and divide Malaysians against each other, and exactly why this is being done in the greater context of US hegemony in Asia.
Anwar & Bersih’s US State Department Backers
The US State Department’s NED and NDI are most certainly not benevolent promoters of democracy and freedom.Does Boeing, Goldman Sachs, Exxon, the SOPA, ACTA, CISPA-sponsoring US Chamber of Commerce, and America’s warmongering Neo-Con establishment care about promoting democracy in Malaysia? Or in expanding their corporate-financier interests in Asia under the guise of promoting democracy? Clearly the latter.
The NDI, which Bersih leader Ambiga Sreenevasan herself admits funds her organization, is likewise chaired by an unsavory collection of corporate interests.
The average Malaysian, disenfranchised with the ruling government as they may be, cannot possibly believe these people are funding and propping up clearly disingenuous NGOs in direct support of a compromised Anwar Ibrahim, for the best interests of Malaysia.The end game for the US with an Anwar Ibrahim/People’s Alliance-led government, is a Malaysia that capitulates to both US free trade schemes and US foreign policy. In Malaysia’s case, this will leave the extensive economic independence achieved since escaping out from under British rule, gutted, while the nation’s resources are steered away from domestic development and toward a proxy confrontation with China, just as is already being done in Korea, Japan, and the Philippines.

Stitching ASEAN Together with Proxy Regimes to Fight China 
Image: Lemuel Gulliver on the island of Lilliput, having been overtaken while asleep by ropes and stakes by the diminutive but numerous Lilliputians. Western corporate-financier interests envision organizing Southeast Asia into a supranational bloc, ASEAN (Association of Southeast Asian Nations), to use the smaller nations as a combined front to “tie down” China in a similar manner. Unlike in the story “Gulliver’s Travels,” China may well break free of its binds and stomp the Lilliputian leaders flat for their belligerence. 
….
That the US goal is to use Malaysia and other Southeast Asian nations against China is not merely speculation. It is the foundation of a long-documented conspiracy dating back as far as 1997, and reaffirmed by US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton as recently as 2011.

In 1997,  Fortune 500-funded (page 19) Brookings Institution policy scribe Robert Kagan penned, “What China Knows That We Don’t: The Case for a New Strategy of Containment,” which spells out the policy Wall Street and London were already in the process of implementing even then, albeit in a somewhat more nebulous manner. In his essay, Kagan literally states (emphasis added):
The present world order serves the needs of the United States and its allies, which constructed it. And it is poorly suited to the needs of a Chinese dictatorship trying to maintain power at home and increase its clout abroad. Chinese leaders chafe at the constraints on them and worry that they must change the rules of the international system before the international system changes them.
Here, Kagan openly admits that the “world order,” or the “international order,” is simply American-run global hegemony, dictated by US interests. These interests, it should be kept in mind, are not those of the American people, but of the immense corporate-financier interests of the Anglo-American establishment. Kagan continues (emphasis added):
In truth, the debate over whether we should or should not contain China is a bit silly. We are already containing China — not always consciously and not entirely successfully, but enough to annoy Chinese leaders and be an obstacle to their ambitions. When the Chinese used military maneuvers and ballistic-missile tests last March to intimidate Taiwanese voters, the United States responded by sending the Seventh Fleet. By this show of force, the U.S. demonstrated to Taiwan, Japan, and the rest of our Asian allies that our role as their defender in the region had not diminished as much as they might have feared. Thus, in response to a single Chinese exercise of muscle, the links of containment became visible and were tightened.
The new China hands insist that the United States needs to explain to the Chinese that its goal is merely, as [Robert] Zoellick writes, to avoid “the domination of East Asia by any power or group of powers hostile to the United States.” Our treaties with Japan, South Korea, the Philippines, Thailand, and Australia, and our naval and military forces in the region, aim only at regional stability, not aggressive encirclement.
But the Chinese understand U.S. interests perfectly well, perhaps better than we do. While they welcome the U.S. presence as a check on Japan, the nation they fear most, they can see clearly that America’s military and diplomatic efforts in the region severely limit their own ability to become the region’s hegemon. According to Thomas J. Christensen, who spent several months interviewing Chinese military and civilian government analysts, Chinese leaders worry that they will “play Gulliver to Southeast Asia’s Lilliputians, with the United States supplying the rope and stakes.”
Indeed, the United States blocks Chinese ambitions merely by supporting what we like to call “international norms” of behavior. Christensen points out that Chinese strategic thinkers consider “complaints about China’s violations of international norms” to be part of “an integrated Western strategy, led by Washington, to prevent China from becoming a great power.
What Kagan is talking about is maintaining American preeminence across all of Asia and producing a strategy of tension to divide and limit the power of any single player vis-a-vis Wall Street and London’s hegemony. Kagan would continue (emphasis added):
The changes in the external and internal behavior of the Soviet Union in the late 1980s resulted at least in part from an American strategy that might be called “integration through containment and pressure for change.”
Such a strategy needs to be applied to China today. As long as China maintains its present form of government, it cannot be peacefully integrated into the international order. For China’s current leaders, it is too risky to play by our rules — yet our unwillingness to force them to play by our rules is too risky for the health of the international order. The United States cannot and should not be willing to upset the international order in the mistaken belief that accommodation is the best way to avoid a confrontation with China.
We should hold the line instead and work for political change in Beijing. That means strengthening our military capabilities in the region, improving our security ties with friends and allies, and making clear that we will respond, with force if necessary, when China uses military intimidation or aggression to achieve its regional ambitions. It also means not trading with the Chinese military or doing business with firms the military owns or operates. And it means imposing stiff sanctions when we catch China engaging in nuclear proliferation.
A successful containment strategy will require increasing, not decreasing, our overall defense capabilities. Eyre Crowe warned in 1907 that “the more we talk of the necessity of economising on our armaments, the more firmly will the Germans believe that we are tiring of the struggle, and that they will win by going on.” Today, the perception of our military decline is already shaping Chinese calculations. In 1992, an internal Chinese government document said that America’s “strength is in relative decline and that there are limits to what it can do.” This perception needs to be dispelled as quickly as possible.
Kagan’s talk of “responding” to China’s expansion is clearly manifested today in a series of proxy conflicts growing between US-backed Japan, and the US-backed Philippines, and to a lesser extent between North and South Korea, and even beginning to show in Myanmar. The governments of these nations have capitulated to US interests and their eagerness to play the role of America’s proxies in the region, even at their own cost, is not a surprise. To expand this, however, the US fully plans on integrating Southeast Asia, installing proxy regimes, and likewise turning their resources and people against China.
In 2011, then Secretary of State Hillary Clinton unveiled the capstone to Kagan’s 1997 conspiracy. She published in Foreign Policy magazine, a piece titled, “America’s Pacific Century” where she explicitly states:
In the next 10 years, we need to be smart and systematic about where we invest time and energy, so that we put ourselves in the best position to sustain our leadership, secure our interests, and advance our values. One of the most important tasks of American statecraft over the next decade will therefore be to lock in a substantially increased investment — diplomatic, economic, strategic, and otherwise — in the Asia-Pacific region.
To “sustain our leadership,” “secure our interests,” and “advance our values,” are clearly hegemonic statements, and indicates that the US’ goal for “substantially increased investment,” including buying off NGOs and opposition parties in Malaysia, seeks to directly serve US leadership, interests, and “values,”  not within US borders, but outside them, and specifically across all of Asia.
Clinton continues:
At a time when the region is building a more mature security and economic architecture to promote stability and prosperity, U.S. commitment there is essential. It will help build that architecture and pay dividends for continued American leadership well into this century, just as our post-World War II commitment to building a comprehensive and lasting transatlantic network of institutions and relationships has paid off many times over — and continues to do so.
The “architecture” referred to is the supranational ASEAN bloc – and again Clinton confirms that the US’ commitment to this process is designed not to lift up Asia, but to maintain its own hegemony across the region, and around the world.
Clinton then openly admits that the US seeks to exploit Asia’s economic growth:
Harnessing Asia’s growth and dynamism is central to American economic and strategic interests and a key priority for President Obama. Open markets in Asia provide the United States with unprecedented opportunities for investment, trade, and access to cutting-edge technology. Our economic recovery at home will depend on exports and the ability of American firms to tap into the vast and growing consumer base of Asia.
Of course, the purpose of an economy is to meet the needs of those who live within it. The Asian economy therefore ought to serve the needs and interests of Asians – not a hegemonic empire on the other side of the Pacific. Clinton’s piece could easily double as a declaration by England’s King George and his intentions toward emptying out the New World.
And no empire is complete without establishing a permanent military garrison on newly claimed territory. Clinton explains (emphasis added):
With this in mind, our work will proceed along six key lines of action: strengthening bilateral security alliances; deepening our working relationships with emerging powers, including with China; engaging with regional multilateral institutions; expanding trade and investment; forging a broad-based military presence; and advancing democracy and human rights.
And of course, by “advancing democracy and human rights,” Clinton means the continuation of funding faux-NGOs that disingenuously leverage human rights and democracy promotion to politically undermine targeted governments in pursuit of installing more obedient proxy regimes.
The piece is lengthy, and while a lot of readers may be tempted to gloss over some of the uglier, overtly imperial aspects of Clinton’s statement, the proof of America’s true intentions in Asia can be seen clearly manifested today, with the intentional encouragement of provocations between North and South Korea, an expanding confrontation between China and US proxies, Japan and the Philippines, and with mobs taking to the streets in Malaysia in hopes of overturning an election US-proxy Anwar Ibrahim had no chance of winning.
Clean & Fair Elections?
While the battle cry for Anwar Ibrahim, his People’s Alliance, and Bersih have been “clean and fair elections,” in reality, allegations of fraud began long before the elections even started. This was not because Anwar’s opposition party had evidence of such fraud – instead, this was to implant the idea into people’s minds long before the elections, deeply enough to justify claims of stolen elections no matter how the polls eventually turned out.
At one point during the elections, before ballots were even counted, Anwar Ibrahim declared victory - a move that analysts across the region noted was provocative, dangerous, and incredibly irresponsible. Again, there could not have been any evidence that Anwar won, because ballots had not yet been counted. It was again a move meant to manipulate the public and set the stage for contesting Anwar’s inevitable loss – in the streets with mobs and chaos in typical Western-backed color revolution style.
One must seriously ask themselves, considering Anwar’s foreign backers, those backers’ own stated intentions for Asia, and Anwar’s irresponsible, baseless claims before, during, and after the elections – what is “clean and fair” about any of this?
Anwar Ibrahim is a fraud, an overt proxy of foreign interests. His satellite NGOs, including the insidious Bersih movement openly funded by foreign corporate-financier interests, and the equally insidious polling NGO Merdeka who portrays itself as “independent” despite being funded directly by a foreign government, are likewise frauds – drawing in well-intentioned people through slick marketing, just as cigarette companies do.
And like cigarette companies who sell what is for millions essentially a slow, painful, humiliating death sentence that will leave one broken financially and spiritually before ultimately outright killing them, Anwar’s US-backed opposition is also selling Malaysia a slow, painful, humiliating death. Unfortunately, also like cigarettes, well-intentioned but impressionable people have not gathered all of the facts, and have instead have based their support on only the marketing, gimmicks, slogans, and tricks of a well-oiled, manipulative political machine.
For that folly, Malaysia may pay a heavy price one day – but for Anwar and his opposition party today, they have lost the elections, and the cheap veneer of America’s “democracy promotion” racket is quickly peeling away. For now, America has tripped in mid-pivot toward its hegemonic agenda in Asia, with Malaysia’s ruling government providing a model for other nations in the region to follow, should they be interested in sovereignty and independent progress – no matter how flawed or slow it may be.