BERITADARIGUNUNG:
I am confused. Opposition was saying for the past few years that Malaysia under Abdullah is very democratic. Abdullah himself agreed to that, in recent press conference that he will be best remembered as that. As far as i remember, only Mahathir labels Malaysia as a police state when he was barred from seeing people and voicing his opinion. Shahrir enjoy the current political climate, which allow him to spit his mind.
I have been thinking that, this particular honey is long overdue, it lost its sweetness and turned sour. Now it will be thrown out the window. Gone are the sweetness, honey and democracy.
Then who will remember Abdullah as a democratic leader? He may be seen as being democratic because for unkown reasons, he let everyone say what they like as he himself has none. This particular issue concern him most, therefore he make it clear to everyone, i am still good, and i will cling to it. The Power for whatever reasons he can think of. I suppose it will very gracious of him to step down and handover to whoever is suitable. Abdullah is just an overdue honey. So is his democracy.
KUALA LUMPUR (AFP) — Malaysia's opposition on Monday accused the government of turning parliament into a "war zone", as armed police sealed off the building amid fears of a protest.
Roads leading to parliament, which are important entry points to the capital Kuala Lumpur, were closed down by at least 400 heavily armed police, causing massive traffic jams that left motorists fuming over the move.
The security measures were put in place as the opposition attempted to hold a parliamentary debate on the shortcomings of beleaguered Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, who is fending off calls to resign.
As expected, the parliament's speaker rejected the motion, triggering a walkout of lawmakers from the three-party opposition alliance led by Anwar Ibrahim.
"Today is a day we have never seen before in the history of the country, where parliament has become a war zone," said Anwar's wife, Wan Azizah Wan Ismail, who leads their Keadilan party.
Anwar was banned from coming to parliament by a court order. Instead he was called for an interview with police over new accusations of sodomy -- the same charge that saw him jailed a decade ago.
The opposition always denied it was planning a protest and there were no signs of gatherings at parliament. Lim Guan Eng from the Democratic Action Party condemned the decision to roll out police and barbed-wire barricades.
"Why do we put parliament under siege, turning parliament into a police state? It is unnecessary and the government is trying to instil fear using the police," he told reporters.
"Parliament should be open to the public to participate so they can listen to the debates and see how participatory democracy works. What we want to see is democracy in action, not police in action," he said.
Home Minister Syed Hamid Albar defended the police measures, which included officers armed with assault rifles patrolling inside the parliament building, saying they had to take "preventive action".
"I apologise to the public for the traffic jams but the police have to do their job to ensure a smooth access to parliament. With all sorts of threats and intimidation that come out, we cannot wait for things to happen," he said.
Nazri Aziz, the minister in charge of parliament, criticised the opposition's attempt to stage a debate that would have addressed criticisms of Abdullah and accusations that he has lost the country's confidence.
"I think the no-confidence motion is a waste of time. It is eating into the house's time to debate this motion which has no voting element and so it cannot resolve anything," he said.
In the March polls, the opposition alliance won a record number of 82 seats in the 222-seat lower house of parliament.
Anwar -- a former deputy premier who was jailed for six years on sodomy and corruption charges before making a return to politics -- has rattled Abdullah's ruling coalition by saying he is poised to oust the government with the help of defecting lawmakers.
BERITADARIGUNUNG: I am confused. Opposition was saying for the past few years that Malaysia under Abdullah is very democratic. Abdullah himself agreed to that, in recent press conference that he will be best remembered as that. As far as i remember, only Mahathir labels Malaysia as a police state when he was barred from seeing people and voicing his opinion. Shahrir enjoy the current political climate, which allow him to spit his mind.
I have been thinking that, this particular honey is long overdue, it lost its sweetness and turned sour. Now it will be thrown out the window. Gone are the sweetness, honey and democracy.
Then who will remember Abdullah as a democratic leader? He may be seen as being democratic because for unkown reasons, he let everyone say what they like as he himself has none. This particular issue concern him most, therefore he make it clear to everyone, i am still good, and i will cling to it. The Power for whatever reasons he can think of. I suppose it will very gracious of him to step down and handover to whoever is suitable. Abdullah is just an overdue honey. So is his democracy. ... Malaysian opposition says parliament under siege
AFP
